[This was published in the winter edition of the
I read an interesting quote in a New Yorker article a while back. It involved the
The hope of Peace Corps, besides accomplishing the three goals, is to see and understand how another people live, think and experience the world. Indeed, it may be the greatest part of our service. It also means in order to truly understand another people we have to first understand who we are and what we think. It requires a level of self-reflection and introspection that at times, I fear, is lacking in the Peace Corps community.
(Before resentment occurs or the comments “Who does he thinks he is?” start let me clarify a couple points: one, these comments come not only from my own observations but from conversations with various Volunteers; two, I also have lacked reflection. I was asked to write this piece to promote dialogue.)
What do I mean by “self-reflection and introspection”? I mean the need to question our assumptions about other people, to analyze our constructions and generalizations about a group of people. Plain and simple I am talking about prejudice, discrimination, lack of responsibility and disrespect to Moroccans.
I had an example to use from something many people experienced. But why risk embarrassing people and closing off avenues of dialogue. I think such an example only makes it easier for us to say “We think about our actions. Obviously those people were not” and to think “we’ll never be like that.” I am sure the people in this situation (and other infamous ones) also felt the same way.
The point large examples make can be made by numerous everyday comments and actions. Comments like “that is so Berber” when speaking about an instance involving cheapness, conniving, or down right meanness. Explaining everything that is bad as “Moroccan” or everything that is uncomfortable as “Moroccan”. Saying “dirty Moroccan men”; rudely ignoring people who say hello to you using your real name; looks of apprehension and disgust towards all brown men (such looks are apparent when compared to the immediate change in expression when the Volunteer learns that this brown person is actually another PCV). Or, PCVs putting themselves in risky situations (wondering around major urban areas late at night and intoxicated) and falling victim to a bad person with bad motives, but instead of extrapolating from the instance the need to own more of our personal safety and ask “Would I do this in Florence at 4 am?
What does this mean? What does this list of examples illustrates? In my mind, maladaptive behaviors—outright racist behaviors among the PCV community toward each other, and more importantly, to the people of the country we should be serving. Frustration is understandable; having a bad day or week is understandable. It is definitely understandable to vent to one another—this is a difficult and demanding job. Yet, when the negative begins to cloud people’s perceptions and attitudes to such an extent offensive actions are allowed to continue unchecked, shouldn’t we ask “why are you still here?” Isn’t better for both the person’s own emotional and physical well-being and for the greater whole of Peace Corps for the person to reflect on why he/she is here?
Why is it okay in Morocco we can make assumptions and say offensive comments about an entire country of men based on the experiences with a few (even though harassment is a serious issue, we must remember how context and perception influence situations)? In the states, if someone said “I hate all black men,” or “Latino men just don’t respect women; they are just dirty and sexist,” we would call those comments what they are, take away the “Yes We Can!” button, and kick her out of the Obama rally.
Why is it okay in
Why is it okay in
Why is it okay to assume a sense of entitlement and colonial attitude—yes, colonial—with and towards the people we are serving? Why do we allow a bizarre type of cultural arrogance to affect our experiences here?
These issues on their own are not what I and others are concerned about. It’s when you take them in concert with other attitudes, actions, and examples that something truly alarming begins to arise: a sense of freedom for blanket statements, rude actions, and immunity from questions about attitude, responsibility, and perceptions.
This article might cause agitation among Volunteers. Good. Like all movement, learning cannot occur without friction. I welcome the conversations. I hope we can all work towards a better reflection and understanding of who we are, how we are and why we are in
Our work depends on it.
